UIHistories Project: A History of the University of Illinois by Kalev Leetaru
N A V I G A T I O N D I G I T A L L I B R A R Y
Bookmark and Share



Repository: UIHistories Project: Booklet - UI Senate Committee for Establishing UI Constitution (1915) [PAGE 14]

Caption: Booklet - UI Senate Committee for Establishing UI Constitution (1915)
This is a reduced-resolution page image for fast online browsing.


Jump to Page:
< Previous Page [Displaying Page 14 of 39] Next Page >
[VIEW ALL PAGE THUMBNAILS]




EXTRACTED TEXT FROM PAGE:



IS

II

VL

'I

w

anachi

sms l».\ ih

orl i

>mm

»l

*

will, ii [easl possible disturl . I' indi thai i illj in recenl tiirn il I I incorporate into the man ment of lu I ii thai ha\ I), II evoh I and ernpl I in tl JI pn industrial fficiency. [1 is no1 si thei tl versity or mism is \- ry mi [ually develo] in di i of i m i re h hl\ pecialized and adapt to tl \ of w pk which concerns thai individual departrai or pi

itution. ( >ften this a d a p t a t i o n has l n r e a d >

' "'« I of i-

onsideration of the other parts and h. in Ived a cumbei isl n ni \ « p pha i to the compL development of tl newly 01 iz**d n. Further the individual is nearly alwa; raosl cl< at of the i i in his own particular line and inclii I 1 in rti e tl riousn* s of difficulties in other work than I M. Th I ommitl has been favored with lai umber of helpful

j> m it" tions from colleagues on the faculty. I 1 i'uI consideration in the diseii Th« I II ,n of the qu< tmmittee led t tl e

mulation of the document presented.

h; und that the worl of that sul

Every n ml p ol I r dji

hi i

*>m *> of

i the >rpo-

1;

• of new methods of proc lui

or of propo

old n

which seemed to him a t th tim to 1 ind nt orj mization of a modern u n i v e r s i t y . N II of the SU{ ions from e i t h e r of these 0U1

in the finished document. The sub-commitl nember who I i 1 long i I i rnestly to convince his colleaj s < the d< -ilipj isition could not help feeling distinctly disap] I wh i the f I to receive the approval of the < >mi inal

And m a n y times such propositions were 0 radi IIv am 1

•n tho they were not entirely rejected th uth • w har Iv nize tl in their present form. The same di ntm< i of our colleagues who ha\ helped us in tl ss

th tioo. nd pert to find their propositions in the pi The t r u t h of the m a t t e r is that no c o n s t i t u t i o n will I | ,\

might be desirable. There is evidently i limit lUt I deti hich it is possible to incorporate in anj such document, The din of tl m rial formal] idopi I III« tiii ft.r m , . • when •mpared ith the fin d documenl shows thai the latter ma

h re than 01 third of the m a i l e r which h I a1 one tin

t| N

ther r in

nl If f

'r

I the approval of the Committee nd f , n , n r. r I \w n tin* matter r tmmended l»\

• in the lii h.\ w h h h ll

>iumiff< ind lhal which pp. /ill liapp(»!J(t(| lhal p m p - litioil

I ,|, uutent « llliuitteo