UIHistories Project: A History of the University of Illinois by Kalev Leetaru
N A V I G A T I O N D I G I T A L L I B R A R Y
Bookmark and Share



Repository: UIHistories Project: Booklet - UI Senate Committee for Establishing UI Constitution (1915) [PAGE 13]

Caption: Booklet - UI Senate Committee for Establishing UI Constitution (1915)
This is a reduced-resolution page image for fast online browsing.


Jump to Page:
< Previous Page [Displaying Page 13 of 39] Next Page >
[VIEW ALL PAGE THUMBNAILS]




EXTRACTED TEXT FROM PAGE:



msToi

\i

i

17

nined then on for all, ami the neral rrang ment wh b tl •u st I under** at little change in all sul \\wn\ disnissioi It \\ aid be wron; however, if this stal menl * n t«» I. an stood a- indicating that the j neral committ ba doi ttle v rk nco that tim The pti 186 phraseol xy of ev< r i h lias I n sub • 1 to ri >us analysis. Even the pi ii f \ ha d d and r ived stended consideration. Moreovi • the Commit: has endeavor 1 to take into consideration the I I of arious questions and to as rtain how far its prop* als ;>p 1 ini d i sabl and unacceptable I HIM- of existing statut 3 and ap]

pract - r '.zni. d I gaily in this S t a t e . W i t h t h i s e n d in view I

C mmitfc - ared the assistance o\' Professor John N rton Pomei y of the I » 1 of Law. Profess r Pomeroy de\ 1 I msiderable time to the examination f the proposed - nstitution from the 1 1 si mdpoint. and pr | un for the Committ in exhaustive reporl discussing quest os that might 1 aised by various proposals, f o r tl linstaking work done in this i mnection the Committee £ Is under gr\ .t < obligra* a to Pi ssor Pomeroy. It is fair to state that he fl a ask 1 and nsent I to art merely as a 1 ajal adviser o\' the Commitl and appro* 1 the document from the formal side only. He express 1 distinct tl c to he excus I from any consideration o\' the content, and the Commits -1\ I him from committing himself in any way a the sirability or undesirability of the provisions which h. n -rm u h r i. He Bought mei ly to test the phraseology o( the d< ument with referent t«» the possibility ^\' its attack by virtue of the I rni rather than the content, and made many valuable sui >ns that v. r ( utili. i by the ommitl e in modifying the text to & ure in mor efinite and unmistakabl ' rms the objects which wen in min A r is re] I I been studi I by the members o\' the i mmitt . he met ^•itli t) and discus I orally the tpostions raised, and all furtl gu i! de in connection with each bj the various memb - In Ii- t this di -ii ion the Committee took the whole mat' r n n under Ivisement and ultimately formulated the various i in % ' r which its members are alone responsibl N irly everyone engii d in university work has iin dis jrl h m to him well calculated to readjust the pivsent ui \

gjt

at tl

i

m

that

tic- m a c h i n e r y

I it ION II

will work

more

or

\Vu

m

ntl\

a

: * .

retul'

p Tl

tt.

I I eorr< i>«oo1111<• I\

MIM- i n n it

ator,

pr.

On must t

Kn^laild

kl%> ! d< p i\\

\\\ :ts

-utH« t 11:

mo&t pari Himph ^rown up. Their roots .ire mil

n" m.thod.s s t a r t , d uli.-n tilt' \ . \\

;M

nid th fin

N

methods lm\ I n tpuuded l>\ inv^ul i of II nt and in il>

wtl l>\ \h