|
| |
Caption: Booklet - UI Charter of Freedom (1942) This is a reduced-resolution page image for fast online browsing.
![](https://uihistories.library.illinois.edu/REPOSITORYCACHE/154/lk3LwXV0E6Tk48khA1vVkpz7KcjuELsZBljw3MlMqyP8o890n5r8MXL6PiSARchxOX1C6n251m01Zs78tBz6tryEv2ao7J6Z1yvbi31miF7_7768-23.jpg)
EXTRACTED TEXT FROM PAGE:
23 Bransfield Co. v. Kingery, 283 111. App. 405, 411. 38 C. J. 660, Sec. 200; 673, Sec. 220, Nn. 89, 90. New Orleans, etc. v. New Orleans, 34 La. Ann. 4,29. Van Dyke v. State, 24 Ala. 81. People v. Fullenwider, 329 111. 65, 70. Levitt v. Attorney General, 111 Conn. 634,151 Atl. 171, 174. State v. Berry, 3 Minn. 190,191. San Mateo Comity v. Cullihan, 69 Cal. 647, 11 Pac. 386. 34 Am. Jurisprudence, 922, Sec. 145, N. 21. (b) The Auditor has no discretion but must draw warrants upon the State Treasurer on vouchers duly certified according to law; the admitted facts suggest no justification for his refusal; and the Attorney General has no power to direct liim to disregard mandatory statutes. Illinois R. S., 1941, C. 127, Par. 146(8K People v. Stevenson, 272 111. 215, 221.
| |