Repository: UIHistories Project: Convocation - 1942 Winter-Spring [PAGE 74]

EXTRACTED TEXT FROM PAGE:

I

*l' l hw iwn

i his

"

l«i lividual

in,

Is I

>i bui h •nsibilii I

*•„

O

x|

Huxlej admitted thai tit.- . , ' »' i'l" I." It do( m nish u '" ''' '"' on the Mount "the firsl Bolshei

U>

M

V(

' '

" 'hat William

I'run ,,l,

rv

\l,.n

must

k

will be ml I b) tyrants." Presidenl k v e,j ld nu * *r) 1942, affirm tn a old article ; I a l t h wlu>!l M »* said: Wi are inspired b) a faith which h all the years to the first chapter of the Hook d ci ited man in his own image' To the man 1 ' 1 ™ thus ba upon eternal foundations. • > I all of our fell.»w itizens are men of religion, and w that fact, Hence it is of high importance to realize mi n men ^i :ience there is no disharmony between

D V on the i hand and the constitution of our ph\ il

ivers< n the oth< There are t\\ outstanding features in the life • N ur First, Nature em urages variation and individualization the utn . It detests duplicates. Among thousands of snowns ' -and. or leases of huge trees, you will find no two •t tly alike. As Mendel show 1 long ago, the proverbial xpression as like as two peas in a pod" is silly. Secondly, Nature b -n developing systems of co-operation and interdependent ••tween difl nt forms of life. Such c peration—which the bioloj - ill symbiosis—is familiar to us in the relationships betv i ! >wers, birds, and insects; and between mistletoe and mapletree. It is r more extensiv. than commonly realized; indeed, in one •tic way or another, all organisms are part (^' a vast web of life. Pr< fesf \lfred E. Emerson of the University oi Chicago, in his tddr s I re the I logical Society oi America, recently The prii nd 1! • ' r

upoi

E co-operation is found working in all living organisms important in the evolution of human society than is th< betw< n human individuals or human groups. Over prin pie of natural selection proposed by Darwin, and

• 0 f later fo

man

p ;ijM

untitle concepts, are responsible for th<

per

I

m which

r-simplified, over-sanguinary outlook.

ers both individualization and co-operation, is

0f e thc

not an artificial theory winch we „,,„, N n.re tgainsl its will, but rathei in outgrowth

. man of religion, or a man oi science

,

h n

• e lf

W h e t h e r vou ai

)thf

ou must i n c l u d e that Democracy is a system of | a tionships based upon permanent and universal laws which

human [XV a m ahr< it<