UIHistories Project: A History of the University of Illinois by Kalev Leetaru
N A V I G A T I O N D I G I T A L L I B R A R Y
Bookmark and Share



Repository: UIHistories Project: Board of Trustees Minutes - 1994 [PAGE 318]

Caption: Board of Trustees Minutes - 1994
This is a reduced-resolution page image for fast online browsing.


Jump to Page:
< Previous Page [Displaying Page 318 of 692] Next Page >
[VIEW ALL PAGE THUMBNAILS]




EXTRACTED TEXT FROM PAGE:



306

BOARD OF TRUSTEES

[June 8

total lease for Hangar 2 space equals $19,564. This is in addition to the existing agreement that calls for rent and royalties for the period of July 1, 1995, through June 30, 1996, of $83,956. Operator will pay these fixed base operator fees in equal monthly payments of $8,626.67 on the first of each month. The operator also agrees to manage and operate two of the University-owned Cessna 310's. The aircraft will be solely utilized for University flights. The operator will assume all of the costs associated with operation of these two aircraft including the costs of fuel and oil, regular, scheduled, and unscheduled maintenance, engine and propeller overhauls, and avionics repairs. The operator will pay the University 11 percent of the statute mileage rate charged for every mile flown on University trips in the University-owned Cessna 310's. This currently equates to $0,215 per mile. The operator will use University-owned aircraft and former Staff Air Transportation Service (SATS) pilots where possible on University trips. The operator will invoice the respective University offices, faculty, or staff at the operator's standard rate for this class of aircraft for all University flights in these aircraft. The current rates are $1.95 per mile and $27.00 per hour standby. The vice president for business and finance recommends the amendment to the agreement as described. I concur.

On motion of Mrs. Gravenhorst, this recommendation was approved.

Airport Layout Plan Revision for University of Illinois-Willard Airport, Urbana

(15) The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requires periodic updates of the airport layout plan (ALP), a document that shows all existing and proposed airport facilities, including runways, taxiways, clear zones, airfield lighting, buildings, roads, property lines, etc. No construction of new facilities can be undertaken unless the general type of activity and location are a part of an FAA-approved airport layout plan. The last ALP revision was approved by the board on March 12, 1992. At that time a proposal for business use was considered in response to interest expressed by several businesses in locating at the airport. This proposal was to be discussed further in the context of other community planning, and a subsequent report made to the Board of Trustees. This proposed revision will incorporate the new snow removal equipment building, the new fuel storage facilities, and a future corporate business site in the existing general aviation area as well as an area for business use on the west side of Mattis Avenue extended. A variety of Federal restrictions limit future corporate business use for nonaeronautical activities in the areas shown on the revised ALP. The proposal for business use establishes only a broad concept for development, subject to compliance with the required distance from runways and taxiways. Specific proposals for future development will be subject to height restrictions and the usual University review and approval process. The business use is consistent with both existing and future airport operations as well as the Village of Savoy's comprehensive land use plans. Discussions with other governmental representatives have determined that such a development will not be in conflict with land use plans or studies adopted or being considered by either the cities of Champaign and Urbana or Champaign County. Accordingly, the chancellor at Urbana and the vice president for business and finance recommend that the board approve the proposed airport layout plan which will be subject to review and approval by the FAA. I concur.

On motion of Mrs. Gravenhorst, this recommendation was approved.