UIHistories Project: A History of the University of Illinois by Kalev Leetaru
N A V I G A T I O N D I G I T A L L I B R A R Y
Bookmark and Share



Repository: UIHistories Project: Board of Trustees Minutes - 1918 [PAGE 130]

Caption: Board of Trustees Minutes - 1918
This is a reduced-resolution page image for fast online browsing.


Jump to Page:
< Previous Page [Displaying Page 130 of 874] Next Page >
[VIEW ALL PAGE THUMBNAILS]




EXTRACTED TEXT FROM PAGE:



126

BOARD OF TRUSTEES

[October 18,

Salaries J. M. Lindgren at $150 J. H. Whittum at $100 Helpers Chemistry Department, Apparatus, etc Balance, July 1, 1916 $

$

1775.00 1200.00 185.00 98.00

240.00 3498.00 $ 3498.00

This report was received for record.

LEAVE OF ABSENCE FOR MISS F. E. SMITH (11) A request from the Dean of the College of Agriculture that further leave of absence without salary be granted to Miss Florence E. Smith, who was injured last winter in a railroad accident and whose leave of absence expires on October 24, 1916.

The President of the University was authorized to extend this leave of absence for six months.

T U I T I O N OF P H I L I P P I N E STUDENT (12) A request from the Chief of the Bureau of Insular Affairs for the remission of tuition in the College of Dentistry for Mr. Jose F . Nava, a native of the Philippine Islands, now attending the College of Dentistry.

This request was denied.

EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY DECISION—CASE OF J. W. NORTH (13) A letter from Judge O. A. Harker submitting the opinion of Justice Barnes for the Appellate Court in the case of North against the Board of Trustees. October 13, 1916 President Edmund J. James, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois

DEAR SIR:

I am pleased to hand you a copy of the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Barnes for the Appellate Court in the case of North against the Board of Trustees. You will see that the Court in reversing the judgment of the Circuit Court, does so upon the lines argued by us before the industrial board, and also in the Circuit and Appellate Courts. T h e position, which was made clear by the testimony of Mr. Abbott, is that while the University does handle dangerous elements, it does so simply as incident to carrying on the business of education. I suppose this will end the case, but should the administrator appeal to the Supreme Court, I have confidence that the opinion of Judge Barnes will be sustained. Sincerely yours,

O. A. HARKER

Legal

Counsel